|
Título:
|
Comparison of next-generation portable pollution monitors to measure exposure to PM(2.5) from household air pollution in Puno, Peru
|
|
Autores:
|
Burrowes, Vanessa J. ;
Piedrahita, Ricardo ;
Pillarisetti, Ajay ;
Underhill, Lindsay J. ;
Fandiño-Del-Rio, Magdalena ;
Johnson, Michael ;
Kephart, Josiah L. ;
Hartinger, Stella M. ;
Steenland, Kyle ;
Naeher, Luke ;
Kearns, Katie ;
Peel, Jennifer L. ;
Clark, Maggie L. ;
Checkley, William ;
Balakrishnan, Kalpana ;
Checkley, William ;
Clasen, Thomas ;
McCracken, John ;
Peel, Jennifer ;
Rosa, Ghislaine ;
Rosenthal, Joshua ;
Steenland, Kyle ;
Thompson, Lisa ;
Aravindalochanan, Vigneswari ;
Balakrishnan, Kalpana ;
Garg, Sarada ;
Thangavel, Gurusamy ;
Mukhopadhyay, Krishnendu ;
Puttaswamy, Naveen ;
Sambandam, Sankar ;
De Leon, Oscar ;
Mollinedo, Erick ;
Diaz, Anaite ;
Pineda Fuentes, Irma Sayury ;
McCracken, John ;
Thompson, Lisa ;
Burrowes, Vanessa ;
Canuz, Eduardo ;
Checkley, William ;
Chiang, Marilú ;
Hartinger, Stella ;
Herrera, Phabiola ;
Laws, Margaret ;
Moulton, Lawrence ;
Simkovich, Suzanne ;
Underhill, Lindsay ;
Williams, Kendra ;
Ntivuguruzwa, Jean de Dieu ;
Kirby, Miles ;
Majorin, Fiona ;
Nambajimana, Abidan ;
Ndagijimana, Florien ;
Rosa, Ghislaine ;
Uwizeyimana, Jean ;
Harvey, Steven ;
Howard, Marjorie ;
Miranda, J. Jaime ;
Puzzolo, Elisa ;
Quinn, Ashlinn ;
Sakas, Zoe ;
Williams, Kendra ;
Barr, Dana ;
Campbell, Julia McPeek ;
Clark, Maggie ;
Gupton, Savannah ;
Rajkumar, Sarah ;
Ryan, Barry ;
Young, Bonnie ;
Chang, Howard ;
Chen, Yunyun ;
Elon, Lisa ;
Jaacks, Lindsay ;
Jabbarzadeh, Shirin ;
Lovvorn, Amy ;
Nizam, Azhar ;
Verma, Amit ;
Waller, Lance ;
Checkley, William ;
Craik, Rachel ;
Merrick, Rachel ;
Davila-Roman, Victor ;
de la Fuentes, Lisa ;
Papageorghiou, Aris ;
Toenjes, Ashley ;
Johnson, Michael ;
Liao, Jiawen ;
Naeher, Luke ;
Piedrahita, Ricardo ;
Pillarisetti, Ajay ;
Sarnat, Jeremy ;
Smith, Kirk ;
Chiang, Marilú ;
Diaz, Anaite ;
Jaacks, Lindsay ;
Kirby, Miles ;
Ramakrishnan, Usha ;
Thompson, Lisa ;
Sinharoy, Sheela ;
Checkley, William ;
Clasen, Thomas ;
Crocker, Mary ;
Goodman, Dina ;
Hossen, Shakir ;
Kirby, Miles ;
McCollum, Eric ;
McCracken, John ;
Peel, Jennifer ;
Rosa, Ghislaine ;
Simkovich, Suzanne ;
Steenland, Kyle ;
Garg, Sarada ;
Thangavel, Gurusamy ;
Thompson, Lisa ;
Canuz, Eduardo ;
Diaz, Anaite ;
Laws, Margaret ;
Lovvorn, Amy ;
Herrera, Phabiola ;
Thangavel, Gurusamy ;
Uwizeyimana, Jean ;
Gabriel Espinoza, Juan
|
|
Tipo de documento:
|
texto impreso
|
|
Editorial:
|
Wiley, 2020-07-14T00:00:59Z
|
|
Nota general:
|
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.es
|
|
Idiomas:
|
Inglés
|
|
Palabras clave:
|
Editados por otras instituciones
,
Artículos
,
Artículos en revistas indizadas
|
|
Resumen:
|
Assessment of personal exposure to PM2.5 is critical for understanding intervention effectiveness and exposure-response relationships in household air pollution studies. In this pilot study, we compared PM2.5 concentrations obtained from two next-generation personal exposure monitors (the Enhanced Children MicroPEM or ECM; and the Ultrasonic Personal Air Sampler or UPAS) to those obtained with a traditional Triplex Cyclone and SKC Air Pump (a gravimetric cyclone/pump sampler). We co-located cyclone/pumps with an ECM and UPAS to obtain 24-hour kitchen concentrations and personal exposure measurements. We measured Spearmen correlations and evaluated agreement using the Bland-Altman method. We obtained 215 filters from 72 ECM and 71 UPAS co-locations. Overall, the ECM and the UPAS had similar correlation (ECM rho = 0.91 vs UPAS rho = 0.88) and agreement (ECM mean difference of 121.7 mu g/m(3) vs UPAS mean difference of 93.9 mu g/m(3)) with overlapping confidence intervals when compared against the cyclone/pump. When adjusted for the limit of detection, agreement between the devices and the cyclone/pump was also similar for all samples (ECM mean difference of 68.8 mu g/m(3) vs UPAS mean difference of 65.4 mu g/m(3)) and personal exposure samples (ECM mean difference of -3.8 mu g/m(3) vs UPAS mean difference of -12.9 mu g/m(3)). Both the ECM and UPAS produced comparable measurements when compared against a cyclone/pump setup.
|
|
En línea:
|
http://repositorio.upch.edu.pe/handle/upch/8242
|
