Título: | [M.] IV Mégara y Theoc. XXIV. Algunas notas léxicas |
Autores: | Pérez López, Manuel María |
Tipo de documento: | texto impreso |
Editorial: | Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid, 2019-02-16 |
Dimensiones: | application/pdf |
Nota general: |
Minerva; No 9 (1995); 57-69 Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica; Núm. 9 (1995); 57-69 2530-6480 10.24197/mrfc.9.1995 Derechos de autor 2019 Manuel María Pérez López http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
Idiomas: | Español |
Palabras clave: | Artículos |
Resumen: |
This paper deals with the hapax and other terms rarely testified from [M.] IV Megara. Among them [M.] IV 27 αίνοτόκεια is of great interest, because it is an allusive reversal to Theoc. XXIV 73 αριστοτόκεια. A close reading of both poems also shows that the figures of Alcmena, Heracles and Ificles in [M.] IV are allusive reversals to the same characters of Theoc. XXIV. It allows us to suggest that it is wrong to assign the poet of Megara to the Homeric-Apollonian trend of Hellenistic Poetry as opposed to the Callimachean. This paper deals with the hapax and other terms rarely testified from [M.] IV Megara. Among them [M.] IV 27 αίνοτόκεια is of great interest, because it is an allusive reversal to Theoc. XXIV 73 αριστοτόκεια. A close reading of both poems also shows that the figures of Alcmena, Heracles and Ificles in [M.] IV are allusive reversals to the same characters of Theoc. XXIV. It allows us to suggest that it is wrong to assign the poet of Megara to the Homeric-Apollonian trend of Hellenistic Poetry as opposed to the Callimachean. |
En línea: | https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/minerva/article/view/3103 |
Ejemplares
Estado |
---|
ningún ejemplar |