Título: | Dialogus de oratoribus versus Institutio oratoria |
Autores: | Alberte González, Antonio |
Tipo de documento: | texto impreso |
Editorial: | Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid, 2019-02-19 |
Dimensiones: | application/pdf |
Nota general: |
Minerva; No 7 (1993); 255-267 Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica; Núm. 7 (1993); 255-267 2530-6480 10.24197/mrfc.7.1993 Derechos de autor 2019 Antonio Alberte González http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
Idiomas: | Español |
Palabras clave: | Artículos |
Resumen: |
The writer of this article purports to prove that Mesala's participation in the Dialogus de oratoribus is not only a cristicism of the school of rhetoric upheld by Quintilian but it is also a correction of Quintilian's distorted version of Cicero's opinion. The writer of this article purports to prove that Mesala's participation in the Dialogus de oratoribus is not only a cristicism of the school of rhetoric upheld by Quintilian but it is also a correction of Quintilian's distorted version of Cicero's opinion. |
En línea: | https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/minerva/article/view/3164 |
Ejemplares
Estado |
---|
ningún ejemplar |