Título: | Design and reliability of a scale on the concept of empathy. Differences between health and social professions : Diseño y fiabilidad de una escala sobre la idea de empatía. Diferencias entre profesiones sanitarias y sociales |
Autores: | Bermejo Higuera, José Carlos ; Villacieros Durbán, Marta ; Carabias Maza, Rosa |
Tipo de documento: | texto impreso |
Editorial: | Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia, 2014-06-06 |
Dimensiones: | application/pdf |
Nota general: |
Acción Psicológica; Vol 10, No 2 (2013): Content Validation from Quali and Quant Method; 143-156 Acción Psicológica; Vol 10, No 2 (2013): Content Validation from Quali and Quant Method; 143-156 2255-1271 1578-908X 10.5944/ap.10.2 Copyright (c) 2015 Facultad de Psicología. Servicio de Psicología Aplicada. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
Idiomas: | Español |
Palabras clave: | accionpsicologica:ARTL , driver |
Resumen: |
Objective: design, reliability analysis and internal structure of a scale about the concept of the term empathy. Analysis of the concept fitting relation with social or health professions. Method: a questionnaire was designed including correct and popular definitions of the concept of empathy. A total of 284 people answered, while attending a Workshop organized at a health centre at Comunidad de Madrid, the average age was 37 years and the majority of which were women 82% (230) . For the reliability analysis and the exploratory factor internal structure analysis Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. For hipothesis testing one factor ANOVA, contrast T- student for independent samples and Pearson correlation were used. Results: The scale of 34 items offered a 0.919 Cronbach alpha and 4 Factors which explain 50,95% of the variance; empathy (28,850%) and attitude (5,858%) which define properly the term and attitude. And feel (9,011%) and sympathy (7,233%) which encompass misleading concepts. People from Health professions (n=100) scored higher than those from Social professions (n=60) in Feel factor (average of 50.01 and 43,55) and than Social (media: 53,31) and Others (average: 54.76) in sympathy (average: 63,89). Conclusions: a scale on the concept of empathy has been designed which requires to be improved in subsequent research. The present analyses suggests the existence of a misconception of the term empathy among sanitary professions. ResumenObjetivo: diseño, análisis de fiabilidad y estructura interna de una escala sobre el concepto del término empatía. Análisis de la relación entre el tipo de profesión sanitaria o social y el ajuste al concepto. Método: se diseñó un cuestionario incluyendo definiciones correctas y populares de la idea de empatía. 284 personas asistentes a unas Jornadas organizadas en un centro sociosanitario de la Comunidad de Madrid respondieron, 82% (230) mujeres y edad media 37 años. Para el análisis de fiabilidad coeficiente alfa de Cronbach y de la estructura interna análisis factorial exploratorio. ANOVA de un factor, T de student para muestras independientes y correlación de Pearson para contraste de hipótesis. Resultados: La escala de 34 ítems ofreció un alfa de Cronbach 0.919 y 4 factores que explican un 50,95% de la varianza; empatía (28,850%) y actitud (5,858%), que definen correctamente el término y la disposición. Y sentir (9,011%) y simpatía (7,233%) que recogen errores de concepto populares. Las profesiones Sanitarias (n=100) puntuaron significativamente más alto que Sociales (n=60) en el factor Sentir (media de 50,01 y 43,55) y que las Sociales (media: 53,31) y que Otras (n=67) (media: 54,76) en Simpatía (media: 63,89). Conclusiones: se diseña una escala sobre la idea de empatía a mejorar en sucesivas investigaciones y que sugiere la existencia de un concepto erróneo de empatía entre profesiones sanitarias. AbstractObjective: design, reliability analysis and internal structure of a scale about the concept of the term empathy. Analysis of the concept fitting relation with social or health professions. Method: a questionnaire was designed including correct and popular definitions of the concept of empathy. A total of 284 people answered, while attending a Workshop organized at a health centre at Comunidad de Madrid, the average age was 37 years and the majority of which were women 82% (230) . For the reliability analysis and the exploratory factor internal structure analysis Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. For hipothesis testing one factor ANOVA, contrast T- student for independent samples and Pearson correlation were used. Results: The scale of 34 items offered a 0.919 Cronbach alpha and 4 Factors which explain 50,95% of the variance; empathy (28,850%) and attitude (5,858%) which define properly the term and attitude. And feel (9,011%) and sympathy (7,233%) which encompass misleading concepts. People from Health professions (n=100) scored higher than those from Social professions (n=60) in Feel factor (average of 50.01 and 43,55) and than Social (media: 53,31) and Others (average: 54.76) in sympathy (average: 63,89). Conclusions: a scale on the concept of empathy has been designed which requires to be improved in subsequent research. The present analyses suggests the existence of a misconception of the term empathy among sanitary professions. |
En línea: | http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/accionpsicologica/article/view/12217 |
Ejemplares
Estado |
---|
ningún ejemplar |