|
Título:
|
Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction
|
|
Autores:
|
Carracedo Rodríguez, Juan Gonzalo ;
Carpena Torres, Carlos ;
Serramito Blanco, María ;
Batres Valderas, Laura
|
|
Tipo de documento:
|
texto impreso
|
|
Editorial:
|
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), 2018-08
|
|
Dimensiones:
|
application/pdf
|
|
Nota general:
|
cc_by_nc_nd
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
|
|
Idiomas:
|
|
|
Palabras clave:
|
Estado = Publicado
,
Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Óptica y optometría: Óptica oftálmica
,
Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Óptica y optometría: Óptica fisiológica
,
Tipo = Artículo
|
|
Resumen:
|
Purpose: We evaluate the efficacy of a new system of binocular refraction, mainly based on ocular aberrometry (EYER) and compare it with the traditional subjective refraction as gold standard. Methods: A prospective, double blind, and transversal study was performed on 99 subjects (35 men, 64 women; mean age 37.22 ± 18.04 years; range, 7–70 years). Refractive surgery or irregular cornea were considered exclusion criteria. Subjective refraction was performed by three different optometrists and EYER by other optometrists on three different days randomly. The binocular best corrected visual acuity (BBCVA), subjective vision evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS), refraction spent time, and mean spherical equivalent (MSE), and vertical and oblique cylindrical components (J0 and J45) were analyzed. Results: A positive strong correlation between EYER and subjective refraction was found for MSE (Pearson, 0.984; P
|
|
En línea:
|
https://eprints.ucm.es/50765/1/carracedo_i2164-2591-7-4-11.pdf
|
