|
Título:
|
Comparison of Two Wavefront Autorefractors: Binocular Open-Field versus Monocular Closed-Field
|
|
Autores:
|
Carracedo Rodríguez, Juan Gonzalo ;
Carpena Torres, Carlos ;
Batres Valderas, Laura ;
Serramito Blanco, María ;
González Bergaz, Anahí
|
|
Tipo de documento:
|
texto impreso
|
|
Editorial:
|
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2020-01-03
|
|
Dimensiones:
|
application/pdf
|
|
Nota general:
|
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
|
|
Idiomas:
|
|
|
Palabras clave:
|
Estado = Publicado
,
Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Óptica y optometría: Optometría
,
Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Óptica y optometría: Óptica geométrica e instrumental
,
Tipo = Artículo
|
|
Resumen:
|
Purpose. To evaluate the agreement and repeatability between a new commercially available binocular open-field wavefront autorefractor, as part of the Eye Refract system, and a monocular closed-field wavefront autorefractor (VX110). Methods. A cross-sectional, randomized, and single-masked study was performed. Ninety-nine eyes of 99 healthy participants (37.22?±?18.04 years, range 8 to 69 years) were randomly analyzed. Three measurements with the Eye Refract and the VX110 were taken on three different days, under noncycloplegic conditions. Mean spherical equivalent (MSE), cylindrical vectors (J0 and J45), and binocular corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) were compared between both autorefractors. An intersession repeatability analysis was done considering the values of repeatability (Sr) and its 95% limit (r). Results. The VX110 showed more negative values (P
|
|
En línea:
|
https://eprints.ucm.es/58890/1/Carracedo_Hindawi_2020_8580471.pdf
|
