| Título: | Diagnostic concordance of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in a clinical sample |
| Autores: | Crespo López, Maria ; Gómez Gutiérrez, M. Mar |
| Tipo de documento: | texto impreso |
| Editorial: | Universidad de Oviedo, 2016 |
| Dimensiones: | application/pdf |
| Nota general: |
cc_by info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Idiomas: | |
| Palabras clave: | Estado = Publicado , Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Psicología: Estrés y relajación , Tipo = Artículo |
| Resumen: |
The present study aims to analyze diagnostic concordance between the DSM-IV and the DSM-5 for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic criteria and their different groups of symptoms. Furthermore, analyses are conducted to establish the features of participants with no concordant diagnoses. Method: The study assessed 166 people over 18 who had experienced at least one traumatic event. PTSD diagnosis was established using the Global Scale for Posttraumatic Stress (EGEP), a self-report measure to assess PTSD. Results: The presence of cognitive avoidance was a determinant in the PTSD DSM-5 diagnosis (86% positive predictive value). The analysis of the non-concordant individuals revealed that individuals who were diagnosed according to the DSM-IV criteria but not the DSM-5 criteria were primarily indirect victims. Conversely, individuals who were diagnosed with the DSM-5 criteria and not with the DSM-IV criteria presented cognitive avoidance and alterations in cognition not included in the DSM-IV criteria. Conclusions: A withinsubjects concordance analysis showed high agreement for PTSD diagnosis between the two classifi cations. Differences between the diagnoses are due to the new defi nition of C (avoidance) and D (negative alterations in cognitions and mood) in the DSM-5 |
| En línea: | https://eprints.ucm.es/39096/1/4307.pdf |
Ejemplares
| Estado |
|---|
| ningún ejemplar |
