Título: | Telematic strategies in nutrition science |
Autores: | Carballo-Casla, Adrián |
Tipo de documento: | texto impreso |
Fecha de publicación: | 2018-06-02 |
Dimensiones: | application/pdf |
Nota general: |
cc_by_nc_nd info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Idiomas: | |
Palabras clave: | Estado = No publicado , Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Medicina: Dietética y nutrición , Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Medicina: Informática médica y telemedicina , Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Medicina: Salud pública , Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Psicología: Ciberpsicología , Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Psicología: Motivación , Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Enfermería , Fisioterapia y Podología: Nutrición , Fisioterapia y Podología: Educación sanitaria , Fisioterapia y Podología: Dietética , Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Farmacia: Dietética y nutrición , Materia = Ciencias Biomédicas: Farmacia: Salud Pública , Tipo = Trabajo Fin de Grado |
Resumen: |
FUNDAMENTS: there is a growing number of scientific papers which study nutritional interventions delivered via telematic means, due to its potential for achieving a broad reach and a reduced relative cost. OBJECTIVES: to analyze the approach, characteristics and efficacy of the different telematic interventions by which, thanks to dietetics and nutrition, it’s possible to improve population’s, patients’’ or individuals’ health. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a search was conducted through the PubMed and Web of Science databases, to find systematic reviews and meta-analysis, published in first quartile journals between 2010 and 2017, which study aims combined dietetics or nutrition with telematics. 21 papers were included, with a total number of 147 study arms, which main data were systematically extracted and combined into a quantitative analysis. RESULTS: a) Telematic interventions are perceived as useful and acceptable. Moreover, they show efficacy in improving lifestyle-related parameters, but not anthropometric parameters. The evidence that they can produce changes over clinical or biochemical parameters is very limited. b) There doesn’t seem to be efficacy differences between telematic and not telematic interventions. Strategies that combine telematic and face-to-face components appear to obtain better results. c) Characteristics such as interactivity, tailoring or the use of theories and models for its design seem to be associated with interventions’ success. |
En línea: | https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/57413/1/Boceto%202.0.pdf |
Ejemplares
Estado |
---|
ningún ejemplar |