![Comment on “Formation of chenier plain of the Doñana marshland (SW Spain):Observations and geomorphic model” by A. Rodríguez-Ramírez and C.M.Yáñez-Camacho [Marine Geology 254 (2008) 187–196]](./styles/zen/images/no_image.jpg)
| Título: | Comment on “Formation of chenier plain of the Doñana marshland (SW Spain):Observations and geomorphic model” by A. Rodríguez-Ramírez and C.M.Yáñez-Camacho [Marine Geology 254 (2008) 187–196] |
| Autores: | Lario Gómez, Javier ; Dabrio, Cristino J. ; Zazo Cardeña , Caridad ; Goy Goy, José Luis ; Borja, Francisco ; Cabero del Río, Ana ; Bardají Azcárate, Teresa ; Silva Barroso, Pablo Gabriel |
| Tipo de documento: | texto impreso |
| Editorial: | Elsevier, 2010 |
| Dimensiones: | application/pdf |
| Nota general: | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Idiomas: | |
| Palabras clave: | Estado = Publicado , Materia = Ciencias: Geología: Geología estratigráfica , Tipo = Artículo |
| Resumen: |
Rodríguez-Ramírez and Yáñez-Camacho (2008), Rodríguez-Vidal et al. (2009) and Rodríguez-Ramírez et al. (2009) have kept an ongoing discussion about the validity of radiocarbon ages in reconstructing Holocene palaeogeographical models in the Gulf of Cadiz. The discussion considered the validity and correctness of the ?R value to beused in the area to calibrate radiocarbon ages ofmarine samples. These papers suggest that the?R value proposed by Lario (1996) and Dabrio et al. (1999, 2000) is erroneous, and consequently, that all the evolutionary models based on radiocarbon ages from marine samples that have been proposed in this area since 1996 must be revised.However, the papers commentedhere use erroneously the R, regional R and?R values.After reviewing the published data, it is apparent that the most reliable values of ?R in the Gulf of Cadiz for middle-late Holocene samples range between ?R=35±85 yr and ?R=95±15 yr. This means that the values used in Lario (1996) and Dabrio et al. (1999, 2000) fall in this range, and also that the calibrated ages used by several authors adopting these values are fully reliable. Calibrations using ?R values inside this range do not yield significant differences in terms of geological age owing to the magnitude of errors resulting from the methods employed. |
| En línea: | https://eprints.ucm.es/id/eprint/15749/2/2010_1_Comment_Cheniers_Do%C3%B1ana_MARGEO_1.pdf |
Ejemplares
| Estado |
|---|
| ningún ejemplar |
