Título: | La heteróclisis lE so/ to y el pronombre hetita -aš, -an |
Autores: | Berenguer, José Antonio |
Tipo de documento: | texto impreso |
Editorial: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1998-12-30 |
Dimensiones: | application/pdf |
Nota general: |
Emerita; Vol. 66 No. 2 (1998); 257-290 Emerita; Vol. 66 Núm. 2 (1998); 257-290 1988-8384 0013-6662 10.3989/emerita.1998.v66.i2 Derechos de autor 1998 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
Idiomas: | Español |
Palabras clave: | Artículos , Open Access DRIVERset |
Resumen: |
A new proposal on the elusive origin of the *so / *to suppletivisme can rest on some facts: 1) post-anatolian genesis (Hittite ša-aš, ta-aš have to be explained as prototonic particle *so or *to+enclitic pronoun derived from a *(H1)e- stem); 2) the alternation *so / *to reflects a basic opposition animate nominative vs. rest of cases (and not simply animate vs. inanimate reference or similar). The primitive prototonic particle *to was reinterpreted in post-anatolian period as an anaphoric element referred to a non-subject antecedent. Such an anaphoric would have a non-subject syntactic use too. When it was needed an emphatic anaphoric subject, the prototonic particle *so was employed with this aim (a favourable scenario would be clauses with subject change). no disponible |
En línea: | http://emerita.revistas.csic.es/index.php/emerita/article/view/258 |
Ejemplares
Estado |
---|
ningún ejemplar |